The petitioners have been appointed Railway as Wayman, Gate Keeper, Valve man etc on temporary basis. During their service, an agreement was executed between the Ministry of Communication and the leaders of the Sramik-Karmchari-Sangram-Parishad dated 16.11.1992 where it was stated in clause 3 and 4 that the temporary employees would be regularised upon completion of five years’ service in their respective posts. On the basis of the said agreement of the concerned authority, 18 employees were absorbed under the revenue budget. Subsequently another agreement was also executed between the same dated 22.11.2000.
The Court issued a Rule Nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a direction should not be given upon the respondents to absorb the petitioners in the revenue sector and/or to make their job permanent by implementing the agreement dated 16.11.92 and 22.11.2000 respectively and in the light of the judgment and order dated 04.5.2010 in writ petition No. 4856 of 2009 and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to the Court may seem fit and proper.
Mr.Justice Quazi Reza-UL-Hoque
Mr. Justice Abu Taher Md
Saifur Rahman
Constitution, Articles 102
The petitioners have been appointed Railway as Wayman, Gate Keeper, Valve man etc on temporary basis. During their service, an agreement was executed between the Ministry of Communication and the leaders of the Sramik-Karmchari-Sangram-Parishad dated 16.11.1992 where it was stated in clause 3 and 4 that the temporary employees would be regularised upon completion of five years’ service in their respective posts. On the basis of the said agreement of the concerned authority, 18 employees were absorbed under the revenue budget. Subsequently another agreement was also executed between the same dated 22.11.2000.
The Court issued a Rule Nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a direction should not be given upon the respondents to absorb the petitioners in the revenue sector and/or to make their job permanent by implementing the agreement dated 16.11.92 and 22.11.2000 respectively and in the light of the judgment and order dated 04.5.2010 in writ petition No. 4856 of 2009 and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to the Court may seem fit and proper.
Mr.Justice Quazi Reza-UL-Hoque ,
Mr. Justice Abu Taher Md , Saifur Rahman
Constitution, Articles 102